I kid. That discussion we had over spring break was good but it pretty much just addressed personal violence, not the violence of nations or how Christians are involved. We touched on it, but I left unsatisfied.
I've heard many times from Christian teachers that it's wrong for one to commit murder, but when two countries are at war, all bets are off.
That's a load of crap. Wounds are wounds, murders are murders, rapes are rapes, a heart filled with anger and hate is a heart filled with anger and hate whether you're in a war or not.
Perhaps that's why I'm being so rebelious and want to talk about this so much. I think there's alot of false ideas about war going around in Christian circles and no one seems to be stepping up to challenge them anymore.
Lest you think that I'm not personally invested in this, I just want to say that both of my grandfathers were in WW2 and my dad was a cop all his life. The conclusions that we reach here have impact in my life. Just throwing that out there. Now on to the discussion.
First of all, you both make a good point that God gives us a fire to fight for what we ought. However, like Nitish said, your feelings of what God's calling you to do need to be tempered with a more objective source of God's revelation. That's why we're having this discussion. To find out if our feelings are right. I know I certainly have the desire to make my country strong. But I don't know if that's a right desire.
Transition...
What I'm about to say does not necessarily reflect what I actually believe.
These are some of the arguments I'm wrestling with, though.
1. Our home is not this world.
The fact is that all countries are of "the world." There is no country, not Israel, not America, not no one, that is not "the world."
Hebrews 11.13-16
All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance. And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth. People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them.
Why should a Christian, who is supposed to fix their sight on this better country and acknowledge that they are an alien and a stranger in the world (1 Peter 2.11), engage themselves in the conflicts of the world? Why should a citizen of t
Don't the countries of this world just fight to increase their own power?
How can a Christian involve themselves in such a conflict? We are not about gaining power for ourselves to our gain.
A Christian should then fight only for the sake of the country to which they are allied with...God's country if you will...yes, I mean Texas.
Seriously, though, we've gotten to the point where most people don't even think about who they're allying themselves with. So often it's seen as God and country rather than God or country, which appears to be a more biblical perspective on the issue. Let's employ a little bit of the principle behind the separation of the Church and state here. Let's let the Church influence the state and not let the Church get bound up in the affairs of state. The Church will crumble if it does.
2. Isn't there a better way?
As Christians, we should be constantly looking for God's way of doing things in this world...and acting that way. So the question is, is war God's way of settling conflicts at this point in time?
Deuteronomy 20.10
When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace.
We see in Deuteronomy 20.10 that God's way of dealing with people is, ideally, peaceful. More convicting is
2 Corinthians 10.3-5
For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does. The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world. On the contrary, they have divine power to demolish strongholds. We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.
So the Bible talks about fighting and using weapons, but not the weapons of this world. Wouldn't this mean that, as Christians, we are called to not take up arms to settle national conflicts? Shouldn't we fight instead with spiritual weapons of service, wisdom, etc. ...the knowledge of God?
I think that's a beautiful idea. A noble, inspiring idea.
You don't hear stories of the Apostles taking up arms to fight for or against Rome or any other country for that matter.
A related idea is what you said about the discipline, honor, brotherhood, trust and obedience found in the military. It seems to me that we should see those qualities in the Church. Why should we have to take up the weapons of this world to experience them? And I believe that in the Church they'd be found in a better form...one that allows for much more creativity and thought than in a military. That's one of the huge things that bothers me about the military: their training is so much about near-brainwashing. I don't think that's a good idea. Man is not a machine and should not be trained to be little more than one. That's not what God wants of us.
3. Do Christians really need to act all the time?
1 Corinthians 5.12
What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church?
Do we really need to act when God's moral law is challenged? When a non-Christian man buys a prostitute is it our duty to do something? When one country attacks another, is a Christian required to step into the conflict? If so, then we are failing radically in our mission.
4. Christians in war - the Crusades
We still haven't been forgiven for the Crusades, a war that Christians got involved in for wrong reasons.
A bad idea.
Again, these views aren't meant to be a personal attack and they don't necessarily represent what I believe. I hope no one feels personally attacked by them...but I do hope they will provoke personal reflection and, if need be, change.
What do you think?